Tuesday, June 14, 2011

Changes To The Debit Interchange Rule

Kevin Sullivan, Staff

According to the proposed rule, the allowable costs for interchange would be limited to no more than the issuer’s allowable cost divided by the number of electronic debit transactions on which the issuer received or charged an interchange transaction fee in the calendar year. Or the issuer could receive debit interchange capped at 12 cents per transaction.

Credit unions’ efforts to delay the Federal Reserve’s rule regulating debit interchange fees by up to a year came up short June 8, 2011 as the Senate defeated an amendment by Senator Jon Tester (D-Montana) and Bob Corker (R-Tennessee). The measure received 54 votes, 6 short of the 60 needed. There were 45 senators who opposed it.

The vote capped a year-long battle between financial institutions and retailers over the fees that retailers pay every time someone swipes their debit card. The financial overhaul bill passed last year contained an amendment sponsored by Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Illinois), which mandated that the Federal Reserve write a rule on interchange fees. Durbin’s amendment passed last year.
The Federal Reserve’s rule is supposed to take effect on July 21, 2011. It issued a draft rule in December and a final rule was to be issued in May, but was delayed. For more information please contact a Financial Institutions Group specialist at 248.244.3110.

Thursday, June 2, 2011

Expanded 1099 Reporting Requirements Repealed

Despite numerous uncertainties, many states and the federal government are moving forward with implementing aspects of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (the “health care reform law”).

However, certain provisions of the health care reform law are undergoing closer scrutiny and some have either been repealed or their effective dates have been delayed. One such affected provision is that relating to the scheduled expanded income reporting requirements to the IRS through Form 1099.

Recently, the Comprehensive 1099 Taxpayer Protection and Repayment of Exchange Subsidy Overpayment Acts of 2011 (the “Act”) was signed into law. This Act repeals the requirement contained in the health care reform law that payments of $600 or more made to corporations that relate to amounts paid for any type of goods or services be reported to the IRS.

Background
Businesses have long had to issue a Form 1099-MISC to each individual service provider who is paid $600 or more during the year in the course of business. Reportable payments include compensation paid to individuals for both goods and services. Some exceptions applied.

Expanded Reporting
The health care reform law, however, greatly expanded this mandated reporting requirement by removing the exception for most payments to corporations. This change was to become effective starting in 2012. Thus, the existing requirement that business taxpayers report payments of nonemployee compensation, interest, rents, royalties, etc., totaling $600 or more was expanded to include payments made to corporations, other than tax-exempt corporations. These new reporting requirements promised to burden businesses with substantial additional
recordkeeping – as well as potential increased costs.

Now, there’s relief: These new Form 1099 rules have been repealed by the Act. Basically, the reporting requirements revert to the rules in effect prior to the 2010 changes. (The requirement that rental property owners report certain payments to service providers on Form 1099 starting in 2011 also has been repealed. This provision was originally included in the Small Business
Jobs Act of 2010).

Doeren Mayhew Can Help
Please contact Doeren Mayhew if you have any further questions relating to the repeal of the health care reform law’s 1099 reporting requirements at 248.244.3110